Navigation Home Gallery Blog Articles Tools and Reference About Links

Making your own art as somebody else?

Posted 31 January, 2007 in Artmaking

I was just reading Wally Lamb’s intro to Couldn’t Keep It to Myself: Wally Lamb and the Women of York Correctional Institution, which is the result of the writing workshops he taught at a women’s prison, when I came across this:

Then, mid-draft, Jessamy hit a snag. She began writing a flashback to an earlier instance of sexual abuse—a hallway molestation by a friend of the family when she was eleven. She stopped writing. But self-censorship felt uncomfortable, too. Jessamy had worked hard on her essay and wanted to see it through. The solution? A change of genre. On paper, Jessamy became Mo’Shay Shamblay, and the pronoun I became she. Mo’Shay had the same hazel eyes as Michelle, the same experiences, But now Jessamy was writing autobiographical fiction. That little bit of distance unblocked her and she finished her piece.

He’s obviously talking about writing, but it got me thinking about how the same principle might apply to photography. Of course it’s a little different in that there isn’t the same opportinity for iterative refinement of a single photo as there is with a story, but with cropping, contrast, print size/method, editing, sequencing, etc., there’s still plenty of room to get stuck, even once the exposure has been made.

I haven’t really thought this out, but does Lamb’s approach sound useful? To be perfectly clear, I’m not suggesting that you try to make somebody else’s work, but to make your own work with a little distance. I can see a case for it being both good and bad (or maybe helpful and diverting?).

What do you think?

Comments

Brett

Very interesting topic. I know it is very applicable in writing. To some degree I think it is inherent in writing. At least aspects are.

As for photography, I can see the possibility of such application. For example, could one develop different “styles”. One personality might shoot technially perfect landscapes, while another “photographic personality” might shoot experimental alternative process images. Not the great example, but just the immediate thought that came to mind. I shall chew on it a bit.

Bosse

Yes, I think this is interesting too. Could for example be used to overcome shyness when shooting portraits, or in other situations where your “ordinary” personality feels uncomfortable when confronting different situations. Guess I am extending this to life in general here…
Like Brett, I must think more about this

Laura

I dig this idea too — for myself, definitely, I feel shy and embarrassed when I’m taking photos, in public and in private, and, as Bosse said, this approach might be helpful in pretending that it’s not really me taking these photos, but someone else, or that I’m taking them for someone else. Hm, what an interesting idea — I think I may just have to try it myself.

Stormy

I like the thought – one could pick a different persona with each different camera. I could become quite schizophrenic. SOunds like fun.

Add a comment

Comment preview

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.