<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kodak infrared films to be discontinued</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photondetector.com/blog/2007/04/07/kodak-discontinue-infrared-films/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photondetector.com/blog/2007/04/07/kodak-discontinue-infrared-films/</link>
	<description>News and resources for [mostly] pinhole, toy camera, and experimental photography.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 00:38:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicolai Morrisson</title>
		<link>http://photondetector.com/blog/2007/04/07/kodak-discontinue-infrared-films/comment-page-1/#comment-50952</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolai Morrisson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 02:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photondetector.com/blog/2007/04/07/kodak-discontinue-infrared-films/#comment-50952</guid>
		<description>I really wish Kodak would keep everyone better informed, it seems frustrating for everyone involved. (I also wish Rollei would make an &quot;aura&quot; (no anti-halation backing) version as Maco did.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really wish Kodak would keep everyone better informed, it seems frustrating for everyone involved. (I also wish Rollei would make an &#8220;aura&#8221; (no anti-halation backing) version as Maco did.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Mided</title>
		<link>http://photondetector.com/blog/2007/04/07/kodak-discontinue-infrared-films/comment-page-1/#comment-50476</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Mided</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 13:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photondetector.com/blog/2007/04/07/kodak-discontinue-infrared-films/#comment-50476</guid>
		<description>My company, Digitaltruth Photo, has also been informed that HIE is discontinued, but I&#039;m not aware of an offical announcement from Kodak yet. This is sad because HIE had much greater IR sensitivity than any other product.

Of the other options, it is true that SFX 200 is only an extended red film, but both Rollei IR400 and Efke IR820 are full infrared films with sensitivity to 820nm. Each film has different characteristics, but both will produce true infrared images. The Rollei IR400 film is NOT the same as the old Maco IR820c, but is actually a much finer-grained product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My company, Digitaltruth Photo, has also been informed that HIE is discontinued, but I&#8217;m not aware of an offical announcement from Kodak yet. This is sad because HIE had much greater IR sensitivity than any other product.</p>
<p>Of the other options, it is true that SFX 200 is only an extended red film, but both Rollei IR400 and Efke IR820 are full infrared films with sensitivity to 820nm. Each film has different characteristics, but both will produce true infrared images. The Rollei IR400 film is NOT the same as the old Maco IR820c, but is actually a much finer-grained product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Reed</title>
		<link>http://photondetector.com/blog/2007/04/07/kodak-discontinue-infrared-films/comment-page-1/#comment-18880</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 20:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photondetector.com/blog/2007/04/07/kodak-discontinue-infrared-films/#comment-18880</guid>
		<description>This seems to be reliable information - it was given to my company Silverprint from Photologic, who are the strongest Kodak wholesaler in the UK. However this is difficult to verify as Kodak don&#039;t have much time for common or garden dealers these days. However we should be able to shed more light on it in the coming week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems to be reliable information &#8211; it was given to my company Silverprint from Photologic, who are the strongest Kodak wholesaler in the UK. However this is difficult to verify as Kodak don&#8217;t have much time for common or garden dealers these days. However we should be able to shed more light on it in the coming week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George L Smyth</title>
		<link>http://photondetector.com/blog/2007/04/07/kodak-discontinue-infrared-films/comment-page-1/#comment-18782</link>
		<dc:creator>George L Smyth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 12:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photondetector.com/blog/2007/04/07/kodak-discontinue-infrared-films/#comment-18782</guid>
		<description>SFX 200 is not an infrared film, but is an extended red film.  Unfortunately, although there are other infrared films available, none go nearly as far into the infrared spectrum as HIE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SFX 200 is not an infrared film, but is an extended red film.  Unfortunately, although there are other infrared films available, none go nearly as far into the infrared spectrum as HIE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
