<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Roid Week 2008 is here!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photondetector.com/blog/2008/04/21/roid-week-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photondetector.com/blog/2008/04/21/roid-week-2008/</link>
	<description>News and resources for [mostly] pinhole, toy camera, and experimental photography.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 00:38:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicolai Morrisson</title>
		<link>http://photondetector.com/blog/2008/04/21/roid-week-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-102979</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolai Morrisson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photondetector.com/blog/2008/04/21/roid-week-2008/#comment-102979</guid>
		<description>Ugh, that&#039;s like losing sheets of gold!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh, that&#8217;s like losing sheets of gold!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://photondetector.com/blog/2008/04/21/roid-week-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-102842</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 23:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photondetector.com/blog/2008/04/21/roid-week-2008/#comment-102842</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m in. Thanks for the reminder. I&#039;m using type 665 in a square format built into a home-made pinhole. First exposure was just made, and I&#039;m quite happy with it.

I&#039;m hoping that I won&#039;t experience the disaster that I had over the weekend with a pack of 665. The exposures were coming out nicely, then the film jammed in the back. I lost six exposures of type 665, which in today&#039;s market is practically priceless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in. Thanks for the reminder. I&#8217;m using type 665 in a square format built into a home-made pinhole. First exposure was just made, and I&#8217;m quite happy with it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m hoping that I won&#8217;t experience the disaster that I had over the weekend with a pack of 665. The exposures were coming out nicely, then the film jammed in the back. I lost six exposures of type 665, which in today&#8217;s market is practically priceless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
