<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kodak to discontinue 400UC film by year&#8217;s end</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photondetector.com/blog/2008/09/14/kodak-portra-400uc-discontinued-soon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photondetector.com/blog/2008/09/14/kodak-portra-400uc-discontinued-soon/</link>
	<description>News and resources for [mostly] pinhole, toy camera, and experimental photography.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 00:38:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicolai Morrisson</title>
		<link>http://photondetector.com/blog/2008/09/14/kodak-portra-400uc-discontinued-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-136041</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolai Morrisson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 14:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photondetector.com/blog/2008/09/14/kodak-portra-400uc-discontinued-soon/#comment-136041</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Colin&lt;/strong&gt;, you&#039;re right, thanks for catching that! Correction made above.

&lt;strong&gt;wirehead arts&lt;/strong&gt;, I &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; like the whole re-done Portra line... the new 160VC is my default color film now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Colin</strong>, you&#8217;re right, thanks for catching that! Correction made above.</p>
<p><strong>wirehead arts</strong>, I <em>really</em> like the whole re-done Portra line&#8230; the new 160VC is my default color film now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wirehead arts</title>
		<link>http://photondetector.com/blog/2008/09/14/kodak-portra-400uc-discontinued-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-135985</link>
		<dc:creator>wirehead arts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 22:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photondetector.com/blog/2008/09/14/kodak-portra-400uc-discontinued-soon/#comment-135985</guid>
		<description>See, I&#039;d have been more worried, but then I discovered that I really did like 400NC more...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See, I&#8217;d have been more worried, but then I discovered that I really did like 400NC more&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://photondetector.com/blog/2008/09/14/kodak-portra-400uc-discontinued-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-135968</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photondetector.com/blog/2008/09/14/kodak-portra-400uc-discontinued-soon/#comment-135968</guid>
		<description>One clarification: It&#039;s not Portra 400&lt;b&gt;V&lt;/b&gt;C that&#039;s being discontinued, it&#039;s &quot;Professional Ultra Color 400UC,&quot; which isn&#039;t in the Portra line and is sold as a consumer film (despite the naming).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One clarification: It&#8217;s not Portra 400<b>V</b>C that&#8217;s being discontinued, it&#8217;s &#8220;Professional Ultra Color 400UC,&#8221; which isn&#8217;t in the Portra line and is sold as a consumer film (despite the naming).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
