<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Kodak Ektar 100 film replaces 100UC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photondetector.com/blog/2008/09/14/new-kodak-ektar-100-film-replaces-portra-100uc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photondetector.com/blog/2008/09/14/new-kodak-ektar-100-film-replaces-portra-100uc/</link>
	<description>News and resources for [mostly] pinhole, toy camera, and experimental photography.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 00:38:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan</title>
		<link>http://photondetector.com/blog/2008/09/14/new-kodak-ektar-100-film-replaces-portra-100uc/comment-page-1/#comment-156921</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photondetector.com/blog/2008/09/14/new-kodak-ektar-100-film-replaces-portra-100uc/#comment-156921</guid>
		<description>I have made a little evaluation/review of this film.
I like it alot since it is easy to scan with great result.
The review: http://www.stockholmviews.com/kodak-ektar-100-review/index.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have made a little evaluation/review of this film.<br />
I like it alot since it is easy to scan with great result.<br />
The review: <a href="http://www.stockholmviews.com/kodak-ektar-100-review/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.stockholmviews.com/kodak-ektar-100-review/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

