<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Photon Detector &#187; batteries</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photondetector.com/blog/tag/batteries/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photondetector.com/blog</link>
	<description>News and resources for [mostly] pinhole, toy camera, and experimental photography.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 17:48:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Shut the fuck about about battery-independent cameras</title>
		<link>http://photondetector.com/blog/2007/04/06/all-manual-cameras/</link>
		<comments>http://photondetector.com/blog/2007/04/06/all-manual-cameras/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 22:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicolai Morrisson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Op-Ed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manual cameras]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photondetector.com/blog/2007/04/06/all-manual-cameras/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If I hear one more person bang on about how fully manual cameras are so superior because you can shoot without batteries, I&#8217;m going to puke. This is one of the most bullshit arguments I&#8217;ve ever heard, and is usually trotted out as a preemptive defense of paying too much for a camera that does [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I hear one more person bang on about how fully manual cameras are so superior because you can shoot without batteries, I&#8217;m going to puke. This is one of the most bullshit arguments I&#8217;ve ever heard, and is usually trotted out as a preemptive defense of paying too much for a camera that does too little.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s true that if you run out of batteries with a battery-powered camera, you have to stop shooting. No batteries, no picture. But &hellip; this just in &hellip; no <i>film</i>, no pictures! You have to carry film anyway. Batteries are small and light, and you can fit several in the space of a single roll of 35mm or medium format film. If saving such a negligible amount of space were really the paramount concern, you&#8217;d be shooting a compact digicam with as big a memory card as it would take, so stick a few extra batteries in your bag and shut the fuck up already.</p>
<p>This argument is normally accompanied by people working themselves into a fetishistic lather about what &quot;precision photographic instruments&quot; these cameras are. This is also a load of shit: well-adjusted mechanical shutters can be off by 1/3 to 1/2 a stop and still be considered perfectly in-spec, which is enough to blow an exposure on slide film. Battery-driven electromagnetic shutters are far more accurate. I&#8217;d think that anyone who pays that much for &quot;precision&quot; equipment and wanks to MTF charts would (and should) be aware of this, but apparently this is not the case&mdash;at least not among the people I&#8217;ve seen discuss Leica and Hasselblad online. (You think 1/500 on your Hasselblad V-series lens is really 1/500? Not likely.)</p>
<p>None of this is to say that they&#8217;re bad cameras or that people are stupid for using them. What I am saying is that every camera is a trade-off, and there&#8217;s nothing wrong with acknowledging the areas in which a given one comes up short. And there&#8217;s certainly no reason to lie to yourself and others just because you paid a lot for something: stay with us in reality, no camera system is perfect. Your Leica M [6 or earlier] is great in many areas, but it&#8217;s lacking the exposure precision most people claim. Your Hasselblad sucks for unobtrusive candids and animals because it sounds like a fucking shotgun. Just admit it. Doing so doesn&#8217;t take away from its strengths or mean you wasted your money.</p>
<p>I have and use many all-manual, battery-free cameras (including a Hasselblad 501C/M, lest anyone be tempted to write this off as sour grapes). They each have their virtues (or I&#8217;d get rid of them), but the ability to shoot without batteries is not among them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://photondetector.com/blog/2007/04/06/all-manual-cameras/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

