<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Photon Detector &#187; lomographic society international</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photondetector.com/blog/tag/lomographic-society-international/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photondetector.com/blog</link>
	<description>News and resources for [mostly] pinhole, toy camera, and experimental photography.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 17:48:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Shit-ass Lomographic Society launches overpriced Diana Mini camera I might actually buy</title>
		<link>http://photondetector.com/blog/2009/08/19/diana-mini-camera/</link>
		<comments>http://photondetector.com/blog/2009/08/19/diana-mini-camera/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 23:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicolai Morrisson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Product News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diana Mini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[half frame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lomographic society international]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lsi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[square]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photondetector.com/blog/2009/08/19/diana-mini-camera/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Lomographic Society launched a new camera today that actually looks cool: Diana Mini. Cool enough that I might actually buy it, even though it&#8217;s definitely over-priced, and if it&#8217;s like the rest of their products, a complete piece of shit. What makes it cool is that it shoots square format pictures on 35mm film. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Lomographic Society launched a new camera today that actually looks cool: <a href="http://microsites.lomography.com/dianamini/">Diana Mini</a>. Cool enough that I might actually buy it, even though it&#8217;s definitely over-priced, and if it&#8217;s like the rest of their products, a complete piece of shit.</p>
<p>What makes it cool is that it shoots square format pictures on 35mm film. This is awesome. I love square format, don&#8217;t like the 3:2 aspect ratio of normal 35mm, but like the film&#8217;s cheap and convenient processing. Unfortunately, square format 35mm cameras are rare and often expensive. This is too expensive for what it is, but less than most of the other options.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the rundown:</p>
<ul>
<li>Film Type: 35mm film</li>
<li>Lens: 24mm (Square Format: 30mm equivalent, Half Frame format: 35mm equivalent)</li>
<li>Diagonal View Angles: 70&deg; 62&deg;</li>
<li>Focusing: 0.6m-inf.</li>
<li>Frame Format: 24mm &times; 24mm &amp; 24mm &times; 17mm (select on body)</li>
<li>Shutter Speed: 1/60, Bulb (N, B)</li>
<li>Aperture: f8, f11 (cloudy, sunny)</li>
<li>Flash Attachment: via Diana Flash Plug (flash not included)</li>
<li>View Finder: built in</li>
<li>Film Counter Type: frame accumulate type</li>
<li>Multi- exposure: yes</li>
<li>Film stopping: yes</li>
<li>Cable Release: yes</li>
<li>Tripod Mount: yes</li>
<li>Dimension: 70mm &times; 101mm &times; 60mm</li>
</ul>
<p><del><br />
Multi-format, square and half frame &#8211; &quot;Wide-angle&quot; lens (unspecified focal length) &#8211; Two apertures (unspecified) &#8211; Bulb setting, other shutter speed(s?) unspecified &#8211; Cable release socket &#8211; Tripod mount</p>
<p>(I just love how they&#8217;re too cool to actually tell you what you&#8217;re buying. I guess Real Lomographers don&#8217;t need to concern themselves with the mundane details of, you know&hellip; exposure. It&#8217;s Lomographic, so you should just buy it.)</del> (corrected in a comment below by davers)</p>
<p>The cheapest package (no, you still can&#8217;t just buy a fucking camera from <a href="http://photondetector.com/blog/2008/04/22/lomographic-society-continues-to-suck-co-opts-worldwide-pinhole-photography-day/">these goons</a>, you have to buy a lifestyle-enhancing, off-the-shelf Lomographic Personality Package) is US $60.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://photondetector.com/blog/2009/08/19/diana-mini-camera/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lomographic Society continues to suck, co-opts Worldwide Pinhole Photography Day</title>
		<link>http://photondetector.com/blog/2008/04/22/lomographic-society-continues-to-suck-co-opts-worldwide-pinhole-photography-day/</link>
		<comments>http://photondetector.com/blog/2008/04/22/lomographic-society-continues-to-suck-co-opts-worldwide-pinhole-photography-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 20:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicolai Morrisson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Kit/Equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pinhole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lomo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lomographic society international]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lsi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pinhole day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wppd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photondetector.com/blog/2008/04/22/lomographic-society-continues-to-suck-co-opts-worldwide-pinhole-photography-day/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The goons at the Lomographic Society International&#8212;the people who brought the world the $20 Holga for $70 and monopolistic control over the distribution of the Lomo LC-A camera&#8212;have now added Worldwide Pinhole Photography Day to the list of products and events they had nothing to do with creating that they&#8217;ve claimed as their own. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The goons at the <a href="http://www.lomography.com/">Lomographic Society International</a>&mdash;the people who brought the world the $20 Holga for $70 and monopolistic control over the distribution of the Lomo LC-A camera&mdash;have now added <a href="http://pinholeday.org/">Worldwide Pinhole Photography Day</a> to the list of products and events they had nothing to do with creating that they&#8217;ve claimed as their own. The headline of their <a href="http://www.thelomographer.com/2008/nl_pinhole_day/">latest newsletter</a> proclaims, &#8220;THE LOMOGRAPHIC SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL PROUDLY PRESENTS THE WORLD PINHOLE DAY&#8221;.</p>
<p>Um, no.</p>
<p>WPPD was started in 2001. As far as I know&mdash;and please correct me if I&#8217;m wrong&mdash;none of the members of <a href="http://pinholeday.org/org/team.php?year=2001">that year&#8217;s coordinating team</a> were affiliated with LSI. Same with <a href="http://pinholeday.org/org/team.php">this year&#8217;s roster</a>. Or any year in between. So to the best of my knowledge, LSI doesn&#8217;t  present WPPD, proudly or otherwise, at all.</p>
<p>Granted, they don&#8217;t use the <em>exact</em> same name, they call it &#8220;World Pinhole Day&#8221;, and the <em>actual</em> pinhole day event is called &#8220;Worldwide Pinhole Photography Day&#8221;, but they look same, and they just happen to fall on the same date.</p>
<p>Why would they do such a thing? Probably because it&#8217;s a good way to sell more pinhole cameras. They have a decent selection of horribly overpriced pinholes to choose from. And that&#8217;s fine. But is it necessary to claim WPPD as their event, which is clearly a crock of shit,  to do so? No. They could have gotten behind the real Pinhole Day and promoted it to their mutual advantage instead of choosing this classically-LSI approach. I urge you to think about the kind of company you&#8217;re supporting when you buy from them (to say nothing of the fact that you&#8217;re almost certainly over-paying).</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s where to get the pinhole cameras LSI sells, or equivalents, for less. Prices are in US dollars.</p>
<p><strong>PinHolga</strong>: $60 from LSI, <a href="http://www.holgamods.com/pinholga/pinholga.html">$21.95 from holgamods</a></p>
<p><strong>35mm PinHolga</strong>: I don&#8217;t know, but you can convert most $1 plastic 35mm cameras yourself, or you can make or buy a pinhole cap for your 35mm, medium format, or digital SLR.</p>
<p><strong>Bulldog Large Format Camera</strong>: $325 from LSI, <a href="http://www.camerabellows.com/Bulldog.html">$302.43 from camerabellows.com</a> (as of today&#8217;s exchange rate, and that includes <acronym title="Value Added Tax">VAT</acronym>, which shouldn&#8217;t apply to US orders). And, you can find used, no-assembly-required 4&times;5 cameras for less. You can try the <a href="http://www.largeformatphotography.info/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=27">Buy/Sell</a> board on the Large Format Photography Forum, the <a href="http://www.apug.org/classifieds/showcat.php?cat=2">Cameras &amp; Lenses</a> classifieds on <acronym title="Analog Photography Users Group">APUG</acronym>, or the auction sites.</p>
<p><strong>Zero Image Zero 2000</strong> (&quot;Zero Pinhole 120&quot;): $165 from LSI, <a href="http://zeroimage.com/web2003/ProductPage/zero2000/Zero2000_2003.htm">$93 from the manufacturer</a></p>
<p><strong>Zero Image Zero 135</strong> (&quot;Zero Pinhole 35&quot;): $140 from LSI, <a href="http://zeroimage.com/web2003/ProductPage/135/Zero135_2003.htm">$93 from the manufacturer</a></p>
<p><strong>Zero Image Zero 69 Deluxe</strong> w/ spirit level &amp; cable release (&quot;Zero Image Deluxe&quot;): $320 from LSI, <a href="http://zeroimage.com/web2003/ProductPage/69/Zero69_2003.htm">$222 from the manufacturer</a></p>
<p><strong>Noon Large Format Pinhole</strong>: $225 from LSI, grab the similar-looking and almost certainly identically-functioning (LSI doesn&#8217;t list the focal length of the one they sell) Santa Barbara 4&times;5 75mm pinhole camera for <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/151566-REG/Santa_Barbara_WA3B_4_x_5_Pinhole.html">$63.95 from B&amp;H</a></p>
<p><strong>Sharan DIY Pinhole</strong>: $40 from LSI, free if you download and print the <a href="http://www.pinhole.cz/en/pinholecameras/dirkon_01.html">plans for the original Dirkon paper pinhole camera</a>, or you can grab the plans for <a href="http://idea.uwosh.edu/nick/">Nick Dvoracek</a>&#8216;s <a href="http://idea.uwosh.edu/nick/populist.pdf">Populist</a> cut-out pinhole camera (PDF link). They&#8217;re all paper cameras that you have to put together yourself.</p>
<p><strong>SmileyCam</strong>: $25 from LSI, <a href="http://www.pinholephotography.org/110%20camera%20sales%20page.htm">$23 from Justin Quinnell</a>, who makes them. Or just make one yourself, which should be very easy.</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s not a pinhole, but you can get a <a href="http://www.sciplus.com/singleItem.cfm?terms=10644&#038;cartLogFrom=Search">SplitCam $11.95 from the awesome American Science &amp; Surplus</a> instead of paying LSI $25.</p>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<p>Why else don&#8217;t I like the Lomographic Society?</p>
<p><b>Shitty products at high prices</b>: their flagship, the LC-A, is a piece of junk. The lens is unique and awesome, but the camera that surrounds it sucks. They didn&#8217;t build them, but they locked down the supply and charge a premium. The first LC-A I ordered from them operated in bulb mode no matter what. The shutter button on the replacement fell off after running less than five rolls through it. I haven&#8217;t used an LC-A+ and therefore can&#8217;t comment on it.</p>
<p>Their Colorsplash and Fisheye cameras have some of the worst build quality I&#8217;ve ever seen. Yes, they work. But for how long? I think my $1.50 Lex 35 crapcams are actually built slightly better.</p>
<p>Their Hipshot was my first camera bag. The seams are unraveling and the Velcro on the camera compartments doesn&#8217;t stick&mdash;even when I press them together carefully&mdash;which leaves anything you put in them likely to fly out and break as you move.</p>
<p><b>Terrible customer support</b>: When I received the broken LC-A, I sent them several emails over the course of I think three weeks and never got a single response. Finally I called them, sent back the whole package, and got only a replacement camera back. I guess they kept the rest of the kit.</p>
<p><b>Monopolistic and bullying business practices</b>: they secured world-wide exclusive distribution rights to the LC-A from the factory (can&#8217;t charge $200-250 for a $50 camera if there&#8217;s any competition!) and then went after anyone else who sold them, regardless of origin.</p>
<p>For example, Lomo Joe is a guy who lived in St. Petersburg, Russia. If you didn&#8217;t want to pay the extortionate Lomo Society price for an LC-A, he&#8217;d go buy one in a local store and send it to you. Check out the <a href="http://www.geocities.com/lomojoe/letter.html">threatening letter</a> LSI president Wolfgang Stranzinger sent him.</p>
<p><b>Getting people to love getting ripped off</b>: this one&#8217;s almost difficult <i>not</i> to find evidence of. People drool all over themselves for anything &#8220;Lomo&#8221; (including things whose only connection to Lomo is that they&#8217;re sold by LSI, like Holgas and Horizons) and just can&#8217;t wait to be taken advantage of by paying hugely inflated prices and having their work published in books that LSI profits from without offering the photographers any compensation. I guess getting screwed by a marketing company is its own reward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://photondetector.com/blog/2008/04/22/lomographic-society-continues-to-suck-co-opts-worldwide-pinhole-photography-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

