{"id":216,"date":"2006-05-23T19:26:46","date_gmt":"2006-05-24T00:26:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/photondetector.com\/blog\/2006\/05\/23\/trix-diafine-test\/"},"modified":"2006-12-02T13:52:55","modified_gmt":"2006-12-02T18:52:55","slug":"trix-diafine-test","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/photondetector.com\/blog\/2006\/05\/23\/trix-diafine-test\/","title":{"rendered":"High speed Tri-X in Diafine reference, ISO 2000-6400"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"fb-root\"><\/div>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/flickr.com\/photos\/luketrash\/150222082\/\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/static.flickr.com\/56\/150222082_bc654888c9_d.jpg\" width=\"500\" height=\"51\" alt=\"High speed Tri-X in Diafine reference by Luke H\" class=\"border\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/flickr.com\/\">Flickr<\/a> member <a href=\"http:\/\/flickr.com\/photos\/luketrash\/\">Luke H<\/a> tested <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kodak.com\/global\/en\/professional\/support\/techPubs\/f4017\/f4017.jhtml?id=0.1.22.14.19.16.14&#038;lc=en\">Kodak Tri-X 400 film<\/a> (400TX) in Diafine developer at high speed. He shot the frames above at ISOs 2000, 2500, 3200, 4000, 5000, and 6400 with a yellow filter.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/flickr.com\/photos\/luketrash\/150222082\/\">Check it out<\/a> in Luke&#8217;s photostream at Flickr<\/p>\n<p>If you&#8217;re not familiar with Diafine developer, it&#8217;s got several magical properties: it&#8217;s a split-bath compensating developer, so it&#8217;s difficult to get blocked shadows or blown highlights, one batch  can last for well over a year, its temperature range is wide enough (21&ndash;30&deg;C \/ 70&ndash;85&deg;F) that you don&#8217;t need a thermometer, they recommend you not use a chemical stop bath (just water), film needs to spend at least 3 minutes in each bath (but can spend more), and since the development time is the same for every film, you can develop different emulsions in the same batch at one time. If you&#8217;re gentle with the agitation, it&#8217;s quite fine-grained. In short: AWESOME.<\/p>\n<p>For more info, see the <a href=\"http:\/\/flickr.com\/groups\/diafine\/\">Diafine group on Flickr<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.photoslave.com\/misc\/diafine.html\">Grant Heffernan<\/a>, or <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dunnamphoto.com\/diafine_developer.htm\">Sherman Dunnam Photography<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>You can buy it from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.calumetphoto.com\/item\/BR3540.html\">Calumet Photographic<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bhphotovideo.com\/bnh\/controller\/home?O=productlist&#038;A=details&#038;Q=&#038;sku=1064&#038;is=REG&#038;addedTroughType=search\">B&amp;H<\/a>, and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/product\/B00009R6YY\">Amazon.com<\/a> in the US, among other places. For the UK, hit <a href=\"http:\/\/www.retrophotographic.com\/shop\/107\/index.htm#DIAFINE\">Retro Photographic<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Flickr member Luke H tested Kodak Tri-X 400 film (400TX) in Diafine developer at high speed. He shot the frames above at ISOs 2000, 2500, 3200, 4000, 5000, and 6400 with a yellow filter. Check it out in Luke&#8217;s photostream at Flickr If you&#8217;re not familiar with Diafine developer, it&#8217;s got several magical properties: it&#8217;s [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[39,461,599,751,941,1056,1469,1784],"class_list":["post-216","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-extra-geeky","tag-400tx","tag-diafine","tag-film","tag-high-speed","tag-kodak","tag-luke-h","tag-reference","tag-tri-x"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/photondetector.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/photondetector.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/photondetector.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/photondetector.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/photondetector.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=216"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/photondetector.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/216\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/photondetector.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=216"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/photondetector.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=216"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/photondetector.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=216"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The constant WPCACHEHOME must be set in the file wp-config.php and point at the WP Super Cache plugin directory. -->