{"id":96,"date":"2006-03-19T16:21:55","date_gmt":"2006-03-19T21:21:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/photondetector.com\/blog\/2006\/03\/19\/nyt-street\/"},"modified":"2006-03-19T16:21:55","modified_gmt":"2006-03-19T21:21:55","slug":"nyt-street","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/photondetector.com\/blog\/2006\/03\/19\/nyt-street\/","title":{"rendered":"NY Times on diCorcia-Nussenzweig street photography case"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"fb-root\"><\/div>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/query.nytimes.com\/search\/query?ppds=bylL&#038;v1=PHILIP%20GEFTER&#038;fdq=19960101&#038;td=sysdate&#038;sort=newest&#038;ac=PHILIP%20GEFTER&#038;inline=nyt-per\">Philip Gefter<\/a> writes in the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/\">New York Times<\/a>, &quot;The practice of street photography has a long tradition in the United States, with documentary and artistic strains, in big cities and small towns. Photographers usually must obtain permission to photograph on private property&mdash;including restaurants and hotel lobbies&mdash;but the freedom to photograph in public has long been taken for granted. Remarkably, this was the first case to directly challenge that right. Had it succeeded, &#8216;Subway Passenger, New York City&#8217;, 1941, along with a vast number of other famous images taken on the sly, might no longer be able to be published or sold&#8230;&quot;<\/p>\n<p>This has been a very interesting case. The article also gets into religion vs. privacy and is well worth a read.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2006\/03\/19\/arts\/design\/19phot.html?_r=2&#038;oref=slogin&#038;oref=slogin\">Continue reading at nytimes.com<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Via <a href=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/artsissues\/\">ArtsJournal<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Philip Gefter writes in the New York Times, &quot;The practice of street photography has a long tradition in the United States, with documentary and artistic strains, in big cities and small towns. Photographers usually must obtain permission to photograph on private property&mdash;including restaurants and hotel lobbies&mdash;but the freedom to photograph in public has long been [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[466,987,1252,1419,1658],"class_list":["post-96","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-op-ed","tag-dicorcia","tag-legal","tag-nussenzweig","tag-privacy","tag-street-photography"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/photondetector.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/photondetector.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/photondetector.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/photondetector.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/photondetector.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=96"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/photondetector.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/photondetector.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=96"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/photondetector.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=96"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/photondetector.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=96"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The constant WPCACHEHOME must be set in the file wp-config.php and point at the WP Super Cache plugin directory. -->