JPEG patent rejected!

Right to Create write:

The USPTO has rejected the broadest claims of the JPEG image format patent held by Forgent Networks.

It’s nice to see the Patent Office doing the right thing, but it’s too bad that more than $100 million dollars that Forgent has extorted from industry will never be returned to its rightful owners. Forgent gets to keep that money, regardless of how the PTO rules. For nearly 19 years, this patent has stood without challenge. Now, just over a year before it was to expire, the PTO declares that it is bogus.

Continue reading at Right to Create

The Public Patent Foundation, who brought the challenge, write:

"The Patent Office has agreed with our conclusion that it would have never granted Forgent Networks’ ‘672 patent had it been aware of the prior art that we uncovered and submitted to them," said Dan Ravicher, PUBPAT’s Executive Director. "Making matters worse here is that this new prior art was known by those who filed the application that led to the ‘672 patent, but none of them told the Patent Office about it, despite their duty to do so."

Continue reading at pubpat.org

Via Right to Create

Online event photography selection patent

DP Review Forums member ILoveNikon writes, "A patent was issued two months ago (Jan. 2006) that could have a big effect on event photographers everywhere. It was issued to a Peter Wolf, the owner of Photocrazy.com…"

Read more in this thread on the Rob Galbraith Forums.

Looks like the morons at the USPTO are at it again. These goons just don’t stop. And who is this tool Peter Wolf? What kind of asshole wants to patent the online selection of photos? Searching by date is such a revolutionary, patentable concept! That you invented all by yourself! Fuckwit.

Patent abstract

A process for providing event photographs for inspection, selection and distribution via a computer network generally includes the steps of taking event photographs, associating identifying data with each photograph taken, transferring the photographs to a computer network server, and permitting access to the server for searching of a particular photograph utilizing the identifying data. The identifying data can include a name of an event participant, a number corresponding to a number worn by the event participant, the date and time the photograph was taken, or a code captured from a component as it passes a sensor. Such a component can be passive or active and can include a bar code, inductive device or an electronic transmitting device which is worn by the event participant. The event participants are informed of the identifying data by posting the identifying data associated with each photograph so that it is made available to the participants of the event for later use in searching the server. The photographs are cataloged in the server according to the identifying data and can be subsequently ordered using the server which is typically an Internet web-site.

Via Plaid Jello